Google Website Translator Gadget

Showing posts with label Indian Bureau of Mines. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Indian Bureau of Mines. Show all posts

Thursday, November 3, 2011

Mines ministry pushes for new iron ore royalty maths

Thu, 3 Nov, 2011 |sourced ET

NEW DELHI: The mines ministry will push for a new system of calculating royalties instead of the current practice of basing it on an average price determined by the Indian Bureau of Mines, ministry officials said. Under the new method, pithead prices, on which royalty is based, will be discovered from iron prices across the supply chain.

The ministry says this proposal, which is unlikely to raise royalty collections for states, will be taken up by its study group later this week. In its report on illegal mining in Karnataka, the state Lokayukta had criticized the practice of using the statewise average prices put out by the bureau, saying that it lead to lower royalty collections. The Lokayukta had found that the bureau's weighted average pitmouth value of ore, to be collected from the top 10 non-captive producers, did not accurately reflect market price of iron ore.

The ministry, however, maintains that royalty can only be collected on the pithead price of iron ore and cannot be based on market prices. In May, Orissa chief minister Naveen Patnaik had also asked for royalty to be charged on NMDC's prices or all-India average prices. Last month, in his reply to Patnaik, mines minister Dinsha Patel said the current practice was adopted after states decided that determining sale prices from individual invoices, particularly for captive mines, was difficult.

In February, rule 45 of Mineral Conservation and Development Rules was amended to allow states to collate prices at different points of sale. Until states decide on what is most convenient to them, the mines ministry will suggest this method for calculation of royalties. An upward revision of royalty rates, allowed once in three years, is now only possible after August 2012. States collect a charge either on the tonnage as in the case of limestone which is largely mined for captive use, or on an ad valorem basis. A royalty of 10% ad valorem is levied on iron ore.

(sourced EconomicTimes)

Thursday, October 6, 2011

Orissa under reporting iron ore prices

Thursday, 06 Oct 2011

BS reported that the union ministry of mines has turned the heat on the Orissa government over the issue of alleged under reporting of pit mouth value of ore prices by some unscrupulous miners.

Holding the Indian Bureau of Mines responsible for its faulty procedures adopted in fixing sale value of iron ore, the state government had earlier sought the intervention of the union mines ministry in the matter.

The ministry, in turn has stated that the IBM has been publishing the average sale value based on the PMV which is reported to them by the lease holders. Substantiating its claim the ministry said the average price of iron ore for all grades for April 2011 for grades that are mostly mined in Orissa compare favorably with the all India prices.

This in stark contrast to the contention of the state government which had alleged that there was a glaring difference in prices of sale value of iron ore in Orissa compared to that of other states as well as all India average.

In a recent letter to the state Mr Naveen Patnaik Chief Minister, the Union minister of state for mines Mr Dinsha Patel urged the state government to develop adequate systems to ensure correct reporting by the lease holders by benchmarking the expenses that are allowed to be deducted from the market value of mineral for the purpose of calculating PMV.

Mr Patel has said in his letter to Mr Patnaik that “In a recent initiative taken by the Government, Rule 45 of Mineral Conservation and Development Rules-1988 have been amended to allow the state to ensure end to end accounting of minerals where the state government could check the prices at each point of sale to avoid under-reporting or any circular trading. You may like to direct your mining department to harmonize their work flow processes especially issue of transport permits around this system.”

The Union minister letter has come in response to the Chief Minister letter to him regarding concerns on systematic under-reporting of sale value of iron ore by IBM on which royalty is chargeable on ad-valorem basis.

According to the Union minister letter, the price of iron ore fines with Fe content of 62% to 65% in Orissa for April stood at INR 2,513 per tonne higher than the all-India average of INR 2,393 per tonne.

(sourced from BS)





Monday, March 14, 2011

Indian government update on land for mining to private companies

Monday, 14 Mar 2011

Mr Dinsha Patel Indian minister of state (independent charge) for mines informed the Lok Sabha that the state governments are competent to grant mineral concessions including Reconnaissance Permit, Prospecting Licence and Mining Lease under the provisions of the Mines and Minerals Act 1957 subject to prior approval of the central government.

Subsequent to the prior approval of the central government, mining leases etc are executed by the state governments with the mining agencies after following the due procedures ie obtaining forest and environment clearances and approval of mining plan from the Indian Bureau of Mines.

Whilst processing the proposals recommended by the State Governments for prior approval of the Central Government, the Ministry of Mines examines the same in the light of the provisions of the MMDR Act, 1957, the Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 and the guidelines framed in this regard and where necessary, in consultation with the State Governments and specialized agencies like the Indian Bureau of Mines, the Geological Survey of India and the Department of Atomic Energy. The Ministry of Mines is conscious of its responsibility to ensure that the mineral concession regime functions in a transparent and efficient manner. In this regard, the Ministry has, in consultation with the State Governments, issued the following guidelines:-

1. Comprehensive guidelines dated June 24th 2009, in order to bring more clarity in processing the mineral concession proposals. The guidelines also seek to ensure application of uniform criteria by the State Governments while examining and recommending proposals to the Central Government.

2. Guidelines dated February 9th 2010 on ‘special reasons’ to be adopted by all State Governments while recommending a mineral concession proposal in favour of a later applicant in a non notified area.

3. Guidelines dated October 13th 2010 regards maps in order to ensure that the areas recommended by the State Governments for mineral concessions are clearly demarcated.